


Unanimously Agreeable True MastersSankarshan Acharya February 7, 2016 |
President Barack Obama,
Mr. Donald J. Trump,
Senator Bernie Sanders and every other leader contesting election Please feel free to circulate. Sub: Unanimously Agreeable True Masters Date: February 07, 2016 Bloviating about a regime for creating millions of jobs while suppressing the truth that the employed were surreptitiously robbed-through systemic lure for investment of net savings under a system of robbery fortified by the same regime-presumes stupidity of the enterprising public. It should be unanimously agreeable that the enterprising people are the true masters of humanity.[1] Mr. Bill Clinton publicly stated in 2008 that only his wife (not her Democratic primary opponents like President Obama) would be able to reestablish his glorious regime that created 34 million jobs. At that time too, I had circulated a memo among Democratic and Republican leaders about inefficiency and fundamental unfairness of systemic robbery of the employed that ensued the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act signed by Mr. Clinton in 1999. Now, Mrs. Hillary Clinton is extolling her husband's employment-generating regime without mentioning how the employed were deliberately robbed of their net savings through laws signed by Mr. Clinton with her tacit approval. Mrs. Clinton obviously presupposes that the enterprising people that lost their hard-earned wealth as well as employment in the ensuing market crashes are stupid and forgetful. Once upon a time, masters of physically bonded labor were also glorifying and bloviating their large-heartedness in mass employment of slaves without ever mentioning how they never allowed the slaves to own, let alone accrete, assets. Depriving slaves of assets produced by their hard work was a deliberate ploy of masters to perpetuate physical bondage. Freedom can be attained only through accumulation of assets, necessary for independent sustenance.[2] Only if the employed are eviscerated of their net assets, would their posterity remain beholden to the masters to work for pittance and, thus, remain enslaved. This is how the system of physical bondage was perpetuated for centuries.[3] Physical bondage is now supplanted by a sophisticated system of financial bondage with government-ordained rules and elite academic brainwashing of the enterprising. The enterprising is brainwashed to trust the markets. Academic researchers are told to not question how the markets operate. Any deviant researcher is threatened with unemployment and severe underemployment. Rules governing markets are foisted on people through vote of elected representatives. These rules bestow only a few Too-Big-To-Fail (TBTF) banks controlled by Too-Big-To-be-Jailed (TBTJ) bankers with government-ordained privilege to (a) garner valuable information through their market making authority by requiring the unprivileged enterprising public to place their buy and sell orders to the authorized MMs for clearance[4], (b) use the publicly/federally guaranteed deposits and Fed funds to trade against the unprivileged enterprising wealth creators, and (c) have the Federal Reserve and Security Exchange Commission protect mega robbers. This sophisticated financial system guarantees robbery of wealth created by the enterprising public at no risk to the privileged TBTF-TBTJ bankers, their academic gurus, and political sponsors. The losses due to risk are socialized and profits from the game are privatized. The enterprising, financially enslaved by the time of their retirement, have no option but to feed their talented and skilled children for employment and robbery by the same masters. This system is designed for aggrandizement and empowerment of the kith, kin and cronies of those connected to the privileged establishment. Mrs. Clinton's proclamation that she is not beholden to this established system of robbery is obviously fatuous and specious. She misleads public by remaining silent about how the laws signed, voted or tacitly approved by her have robbed the enterprising of their hard-earned net savings:
There is another part of the current system of slavery: the public/government has been made to protect patents created from publicly-funded research and by the financially enslaved enterprising. The patent creators and fundamental researchers are not among the 62 who now command more wealth than the bottom half. Very few of them, if at all, may be among the top 1% who control more wealth than the rest. The blind system of review of academic research guarantees robbery of valuable ideas conceived by rookie unprivileged researchers.[6] I have observed some senior professors at the elite academy shamelessly copy my thesis ideas, that too with mathematical errors committed while copying; I have pointed out their errors in my publications much later. So, the publicized 'top' researchers and patent holders are not necessarily the original innovators, discoverers or creators. Most of them at least in my field (financial economics) are embedded in the financial system of robbery. They and the journals they control have failed to publish any research on a fundamentally fair and unanimously agreeable system of governance necessary for efficient civilized coexistence and stability. Their only major success is to suppress such fundamental research, lest it would strip them of their undue and unearned privilege. Even the ideas in the Newtonian laws of physics, calculus and Taylor series, used in rocket science, have originated from India's Kerala Schools of Mathematics carried abroad by Christian missionaries, according to British researchers. When I observed such reckless robbery of others' ideas, I paused to find the true masters of the world. I found them as the enterprising people who protect and support everyone else (rulers and the down-trodden), as opposed to the self-appointed Masters of Universe calling themselves as god's children whose only enterprise is to establish and fortify the system of robbery of true masters. My research, thereafter, concentrated on defining and serving the best interest of the true masters:
It should be a day of reckoning (not denial) for those who have been indulgent in the established system of robbery, deliberately foisted on the true masters for unsustainable self-aggrandizement and self-entrenchment in power. It is futile for the robber barons and their facilitators to continue to suppose that the true masters are stupid. They should urgently support an urgent orderly resolution of systemic moral hazard. With profound regards, [1] Acharya, S. (2015), "Unanimously Agreeable Definitions of Country and Patriotism for Civilized Co-existence," http://pro-prosperity.com/country-and-patriotism.html
[2]Acharya, S. (2013), "Constitutional Capitalism for First-best Efficient Governance, Obtained in general equilibrium based on rational microeconomic analysis, devoid of parochial dogmas, politics or prejudice," http://pro-prosperity.com/Constitutional%20Capitalism.html [3]Acharya, S. (2015), " Diktats of Unanimously Agreeable Governance, and of Universally Acceptable Religious Beliefs Necessary for Civilized Coexistence," http://pro-prosperity.com/triumphantphilosophy-two.pdf [4]Acharya, S. (2012), "Economic Inefficiency and Unconstitutionality of Short-selling and Privileged Private Market Clearing," Journal of Investment Management and Financial Innovations, http://pro-prosperity.com/Research/Sub-Optimality%20of%20Short%20Selling.pdf [5]Acharya, S. (2015), " Coalitions of Borrowers and Lenders, Government-Regulated Lender, Interest Rate and Safe Central Bank in Equilibrium "http://pro-prosperity.com/Research/Coalition%20of%20Borrowers.pdf [6]Acharya, S. (2010), " Blind Review of Academic Papers Unconstitutional and Detrimental to National Competitiveness," http://pro-prosperity.com/Blind-Review-Academic-Papers-Unconstitutional-Uncompetitive.html [7]Acharya, S. and J. F. Dreyfus (1989), "Optimal Bank Reorganization Policies and Pricing of Federal Deposit Insurance," Journal of Finance, http://pro-prosperity.com/Research/Bank-foreclosure-rule-paper-Acharya-Dreyfus-Journal-of-Finance-1989.pdf [8]Acharya, S. (2013), "Arbitrage Pricing of Total Risk of Assets and First-best Governance of Financial Markets," http://pro-prosperity.com/Research/moralhazardliberty.pdf
|